Free Sports Picks Daily

 

U.S. Law Causing Turmoil in Online Gambling Industry
By HEATHER TIMMONS and ERIC PFANNER
New York Times  Published: November 1, 2006

LONDON, Oct. 31 — The online gambling industry is undergoing a seismic shift just weeks after a new law cut off much of the business in the United States.

Big public companies have lost billions of dollars in market value and millions of customers as they shut their United States Web sites for sports betting, poker and other games. Those companies are anxiously searching for acquisition partners and new customers. But business is booming at some smaller private companies, which have continued to operate in the United States despite the ban.

Britain, meanwhile, is trying to drum up international support for regulation of the industry outside the United States. As the first large Western government to explicitly allow businesses to set up shop on its soil, Britain has stood to benefit enormously from taxing Internet gambling companies that moved here.

Most of the public online gambling companies trade on the London Stock Exchange. More than £4 billion ($7.6 billion) has been wiped off the market value of publicly traded online gambling stocks since Congress passed the bill in early October, analysts in London estimate. The bill makes it illegal for a bank to transfer money to a Web site that offers gambling.

The British government has been sharply critical of the United States law. United States lawmakers said they passed the ban out of concern that the sites would increase gambling addiction and social problems.

“The industry has been very hard hit by the U.S. ban,” said Tessa Jowell, Britain’s culture minister, during a news conference on Tuesday at the Ascot Racecourse, where she met with delegates from 30 other countries to discuss the subject. The United States was invited but did not send a representative.

“The Internet is a global marketplace, and that’s why we need action at the global level,” Ms. Jowell said.

Many of the largest public online sites, like PartyGaming and Sportingbet, got the majority of their revenue from the United States. PartyGaming suspended its United States business after President Bush signed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act on Oct. 13. Bankers, analysts and Internet executives say online gambling companies are now discussing merging with each other. Meanwhile, private equity companies, which are flush with cash, have been wondering whether they can assemble a few of these companies into one, slash their costs and reap the profit.

Traditional casino companies in the United States and Asia are also considering buying up the sites as a way to enter Europe. And British betting-shop chains like Ladbrokes and William Hill are thinking about deals with the online gambling companies, bankers and analysts say.

So far, none of these conversations have resulted in any firm agreements. On Monday, one online gambling company, 888 Holdings, said it was in “various preliminary discussions with third parties,” after articles in the British press linked the company with PartyGaming. Any such talks are at an early stage, several people in the industry said, and 888 is considering several options.

Despite its intentions, the Internet bill has not eliminated online gambling in the United States, say analysts and players. Instead, small, privately held companies are thriving.

PokerStars.com, for example, had more than 52,000 players participating in games on Tuesday afternoon. It is unclear how many of those were Americans, but analysts generally estimate that they make up at least half of any online gambling market.

In a statement on its Web site, PokerStars said that after receiving “extensive expert advice” it had concluded that the recently passed provision related to Internet gambling “does not prohibit you from playing online poker” in the United States. The company is based in San José, Costa Rica, and processes credit card transactions through a subsidiary in the Isle of Man.

Many online gambling executives, however, were alarmed by the arrests of two of their peers, and expressed concerns they would be arrested by United States prosecutors. So far, that has not been the case.

Peter Dicks, a former nonexecutive chairman of Sportingbet, was arrested in September as he flew into the United States. He returned to Britain in October, after a New York judge dismissed his arrest warrant, citing a lack of evidence. David Carruthers, the BetOnSports chief executive, was arrested this summer and is still facing charges in St. Louis. He has pleaded not guilty.

While lobbying for regulation rather than prohibition of the industry, British officials said on Tuesday that they would not stand in the way of United States calls to extradite British citizens or residents. A draft communiqué from the conference said online gambling should not be allowed to become a source of crime or be used to finance criminality, that it should be fair to consumers and that children and problem gamblers should be protected.

 
The G.O.P.’s Bad Bet
New York Times By Charles Murray
Published: October 19, 2006
LAST week President Bush signed a law that will try to impede online gambling by prohibiting American banks from transferring money to gambling sites...
Full Story
 

   
   
 
 
Sports Rumble Copyright 2006
US Citizens the information at this site is for news and entertainment purposes only.
Use of this information in violation of any federal, State or local laws is prohibited