|
|
| |
U.S. Law Causing
Turmoil in Online Gambling Industry
By HEATHER
TIMMONS and ERIC PFANNER
New York Times
Published:
November 1, 2006
LONDON, Oct. 31 — The online gambling
industry is undergoing a seismic shift
just weeks after a new law cut off much of
the business in the United States.
Big public companies have lost billions of
dollars in market value and millions of
customers as they shut their United States
Web sites for sports betting, poker and
other games. Those companies are anxiously
searching for acquisition partners and new
customers. But business is booming at some
smaller private companies, which have
continued to operate in the United States
despite the ban.
Britain, meanwhile, is trying to drum up
international support for regulation of
the industry outside the United States. As
the first large Western government to
explicitly allow businesses to set up shop
on its soil, Britain has stood to benefit
enormously from taxing Internet gambling
companies that moved here.
Most of the public online gambling
companies trade on the London Stock
Exchange. More than £4 billion ($7.6
billion) has been wiped off the market
value of publicly traded online gambling
stocks since Congress passed the bill in
early October, analysts in London
estimate. The bill makes it illegal for a
bank to transfer money to a Web site that
offers gambling.
The British government has been sharply
critical of the United States law. United
States lawmakers said they passed the ban
out of concern that the sites would
increase gambling addiction and social
problems.
“The industry has been very hard hit by
the U.S. ban,” said Tessa Jowell,
Britain’s culture minister, during a news
conference on Tuesday at the Ascot
Racecourse, where she met with delegates
from 30 other countries to discuss the
subject. The United States was invited but
did not send a representative.
“The Internet is a global marketplace, and
that’s why we need action at the global
level,” Ms. Jowell said.
Many of the largest public online sites,
like PartyGaming and Sportingbet, got the
majority of their revenue from the United
States. PartyGaming suspended its United
States business after President Bush
signed the Unlawful Internet Gambling
Enforcement Act on Oct. 13. Bankers,
analysts and Internet executives say
online gambling companies are now
discussing merging with each other.
Meanwhile, private equity companies, which
are flush with cash, have been wondering
whether they can assemble a few of these
companies into one, slash their costs and
reap the profit.
Traditional casino companies in the United
States and Asia are also considering
buying up the sites as a way to enter
Europe. And British betting-shop chains
like Ladbrokes and William Hill are
thinking about deals with the online
gambling companies, bankers and analysts
say.
So far, none of these conversations have
resulted in any firm agreements. On
Monday, one online gambling company, 888
Holdings, said it was in “various
preliminary discussions with third
parties,” after articles in the British
press linked the company with PartyGaming.
Any such talks are at an early stage,
several people in the industry said, and
888 is considering several options.
Despite its intentions, the Internet bill
has not eliminated online gambling in the
United States, say analysts and players.
Instead, small, privately held companies
are thriving.
PokerStars.com, for example, had more than
52,000 players participating in games on
Tuesday afternoon. It is unclear how many
of those were Americans, but analysts
generally estimate that they make up at
least half of any online gambling market.
In a statement on its Web site, PokerStars
said that after receiving “extensive
expert advice” it had concluded that the
recently passed provision related to
Internet gambling “does not prohibit you
from playing online poker” in the United
States. The company is based in San José,
Costa Rica, and processes credit card
transactions through a subsidiary in the
Isle of Man.
Many online gambling executives, however,
were alarmed by the arrests of two of
their peers, and expressed concerns they
would be arrested by United States
prosecutors. So far, that has not been the
case.
Peter Dicks, a former nonexecutive
chairman of Sportingbet, was arrested in
September as he flew into the United
States. He returned to Britain in October,
after a New York judge dismissed his
arrest warrant, citing a lack of evidence.
David Carruthers, the BetOnSports chief
executive, was arrested this summer and is
still facing charges in St. Louis. He has
pleaded not guilty.
While lobbying for regulation rather than
prohibition of the industry, British
officials said on Tuesday that they would
not stand in the way of United States
calls to extradite British citizens or
residents. A draft communiqué from the
conference said online gambling should not
be allowed to become a source of crime or
be used to finance criminality, that it
should be fair to consumers and that
children and problem gamblers should be
protected.
|
|
|
| |
The
G.O.P.’s Bad Bet
New York Times By Charles Murray
Published: October 19, 2006
LAST week President Bush signed a
law that will try to impede online
gambling by prohibiting American banks
from transferring money to gambling
sites...
Full Story |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sports Rumble Copyright 2006
US Citizens the information at this site
is for news and entertainment purposes only.
Use of this information in violation of
any federal, State or local laws is prohibited
|
|
|